Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wayne Shaw's avatar

Some interesting points raised by Gary Edwards. Let me see if I can address some of them, and/or raise a few of my own.

Starting with my own biases - and I think we're all agreed that we have them. I don't trust anyone who claims otherwise. Politically, and currently, I am about as deep "blue" as you can get...but that does not mean I agree on every single point. I believe Karin addressed this point about purity tests beautifully.

My family background is such that on one side of it I am largely on the same page politically, but not spiritually. There are signs that the latter is changing, though. I am also an unashamed Christian, and that puts me in the same spiritual camp with two of my cousins, but not politically. I do not know how much the political part has changed, since these cousins are on the opposite coast from me. It may be time to find out. Carefully.

So, with that background and taking just one issue: although at point blank range I am pro-DEI, I also have some serious and persistent misgivings about it. What they are, I'd rather not say here....and is that self-censorship? Is that induced by an unadmitted Democratic tendency to censor? (Back to purity tests.) I don't know. It's something I have to deal with, and I wrestle with it every day. I'll let you know when I have a better answer.

So to bring this full circle, let's say there are some issues on which I either agree with the sitting president on, or don't strongly disagree. Will I sometimes leave it alone in the interest of getting something positive done? Sure. But then, let's ask ourselves this, about any president: even if I agree that they are doing something right (even though I don't like them very much, and may consider them utterly unqualified for the job), do I trust them to do a *better* job than their opponent *on that issue*?

If the answer is "no", a noticeable majority of the time, then I cannot trust that candidate/president. If the answer is "no" ALL the time (or even close), then I have to consider them utterly unqualified. And that something had to be done about that.

That's where I am with the current administration.

I'd like to think I'm open minded enough to change my stance if proven wrong. But as I mentioned, we all have our biases. To claim otherwise is foolishness.

If you've read this far, Gary or anyone else, I commend you for your patience.

Expand full comment
Gary Edwards's avatar

Again, everything you are talking about is resistance. How about finding commonality?

Let's try this, what things is the current administration doing that you support?

For instance, do you think stemming the flow of migrants into the US is good?

Do you support eliminating duplications, corruption, and inefficiencies from the federal government?

Do you think reducing spending to prepaNdemic levels would be a good thing?

Do you want peace in Ukraine and in the middle east?

Do you want less censorship?

Do you want less US involvement in toppling other governments?

Are you OK with biological males being excluded from women's sports?

Do you want American jobs and industries and their union workers protected from foreign predatory trade practices?

There must be some areas of agreement with the current administration that could be used to make some progress.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts